Wednesday, December 25, 2013

How Hospitals Can Help Patients Quit Smoking Before Surgery

Doctors want people to quit smoking before surgery because it reduces the risk of complications, but often don't do much to make that happen.
But, it turns out, just a wee bit of help makes it much more likely that people will quit before going under the knife, a study finds.
Patients who got less than five minutes of counseling from a nurse and free nicotine patches at least three weeks before surgery were much more likely to quit, according to researchers at the University of Western Ontario. Those patients also got a brochure and a referral to a quit-smoking hotline.
Before surgery, 14 percent of the 84 patients at St. Joseph's Hospital in London, Ontario, who were given help managed to quit, compared with about 4 percent of the 84 patients who got none.
A month after surgery, 29 percent of the patients given help said they had stopped smoking, compared with 11 percent in the other group. But those numbers were self-reported, unlike to the day-of-surgery report, which was confirmed by testing people's breath. The group that got help also did better at cutting back, even if they didn't quit. Lucky Strike cigarettes.
"We really tried to simplify the amount of extra work the hospital would have to do," says Dr. Susan Lee, a clinical instructor in anesthesiology at the University of California, San Francisco, and lead author of the study. The hospital nurses were already doing interviews before admission, and the quit line was an exisitng national service.
The results were published in the journal Anesthesia and Analgesia.
Doctors have long known that smokers fare less well during surgery, with complications including heart attacks and excessive bleeding. Afterwards, smokers are more likely to have heart attacks and strokes, get pneumonia, and have problems with wound healing.
This study looked at complications, but there weren't enough participants to detect differences between the groups.
Nonetheless, here's a motivating stat: A big international study published earlier this year in the journal JAMA Surgery found that people who quit smoking a year before surgery had no higher risk than those who had never smoked at all.
So, why aren't hospitals already doing this? Earlier efforts to get hospitals to counsel have been more complicated, Lee says. And most hospitals don't do screenings weeks before surgery, allowing patients enough time to quit. Even the hospital in the study struggled with that. "It was hard to get the patients in three weeks preoperatively," Lee says.
But surgery can make for a great excuse to quit, she says. "Patients are nervous, they're thinking about their health more, they want surgery to be successful. This is a great moment when we can get in there and make a difference."

Monday, December 16, 2013

Susan Sarandon admits to smoking marijuana before almost every red carpet event 'except the Oscars'

Susan Sarandon appeared on Bravo’s Watch What Happens Live on Wednesday night, where she admitted she has smoked marijuana before just about every major award show. During a game of “Plead the Fifth,” the Oscar-winning actress was asked by host Andy Cohen to name a major Hollywood event that she showed up high. She laughed and asked “only one?” "I would say almost all except the Oscars,” she admitted, Entertainmentwise reports. Cohen went on to ask the Thelma & Louise star if she regretted any of her film roles. Lucky Strike cigarettes.

"None. Well, even ones that didn't turn out, you learn something, right?" she said, OnTheRedCarpet notes. She saved her “plead the fifth” for the question of which celebrities she has had sexual encounters with. She did note, however, that she will reveal who has hit on her in the past in her new book. "My book is gonna be all the people I could’ve and didn’t," she said.

Monday, December 9, 2013

Why Big Tobacco Will Enjoy Admitting It Lied in "Corrective" Ads

Lawyers for Big Tobacco will be jumping for joy at the government's proposal that tobacco companies be forced to run comically harsh "corrective statements" in ads and on cigarette packages. The Department of Justice's proposed messages include: "We manipulated cigarettes to make them more addictive" and "We knew that many smokers switch to low tar and light cigarettes rather than quitting because they believe low tar and lights are less harmful. They are NOT."

There's a "screw you!" quality to some of the messages, as if the DOJ believes the main point of the messages is to humiliate tobacco executives rather than to change public opinion. Another warning would say:Smoking is a classic case study of how to manage a business in decline, and you have to hand it to RJ Reynolds (RAI), Philip Morris (PM), British American Tobacco (BTI) et al., they've done a hell of a job. One in five Americans still smokes, despite every reason not to. The business continues to innovate with new products, such as electronic "e-cigarettes," small cigars, and the Camel Crush, a cigarette that contains a breakable menthol capsule so smokers can turn a regular smoke into a menthol before they light up or even half-way through the smoke. Parliament cigarettes.

Further, each corrective carries the caveat, "Paid for by [Cigarette Manufacturer Name] under order of a Federal District court." In case the DOJ hasn't noticed, America isn't a huge fan of the federal government right now. The notice will just look like more Big Gummint red tape, coming about 15 years too late.

The single biggest threat to tobacco is the threat of prohibition. Many people want that. Doubtless New York mayor Mike Bloomberg, who just outlawed smoking outdoors in large stretches of the city, would favor that. But the most important thing about the DOJ's proposals is that they allow the tobacco business to comfort itself with the fact that as long as the government requires warnings and corrective ads it remains, by definition, legal. That's all they want.